Services
Nine services, one platform, one signature
Nine services run on the platform — all on the same data fabric, all under maker-checker control. A full-platform deployment targets a 30% efficiency gain; running alongside your existing systems targets 10–15%.
01 The nine services
- 01
AI-assisted alert resolution
The AI assembles the evidence and drafts a recommended disposition. The analyst reviews, edits and signs. Nothing closes without a human decision.
AI maker, analyst checker.
- 02
Sanctions-alert processing
EyesClear does not screen payments in real time. It takes the sanctions and name-matching alerts your screening platform raises and resolves them through the same maker-checker workflow. Its own analysis can also flag sanctions concerns for referral to the screening team.
Screening alerts resolved in the same queue as everything else.
- 03
SAR narrative creation
Narratives drafted from the alert and the full evidence set — internal records plus externally collected information — ready for review and submission.
Two to four hours of drafting becomes minutes.
- 04
AI-supported customer risk scoring
Risk scores driven by each customer’s actual transaction behaviour, not just their CRM and KYC attributes, and refreshed as activity occurs.
Risk that reflects what the customer is actually doing.
- 05
AI-supported internet investigation
Open-source collection that maps a customer’s connections to related parties and external entities, straight into the case file.
External context arrives with the case.
- 06
Dynamic forms
Your team designs what a case captures — KYC refresh fields, asset declarations, any structured follow-up — and the form goes live without a vendor change request. What is keyed in lands in the case and is analysed like any other evidence.
The compliance team designs the capture, not the vendor.
- 07
AML remediation (back-book review)
Historical cases re-reviewed against new typologies or supervisory recommendations, using retroactive reprocessing.
Months of manual review compressed into days.
- 08
Regulatory reporting
Cases are selected, structured and output in the format each regime requires — Türkiye’s MASAK ŞİB/STR, CRS and FATCA among them — with submission tracking. A new report type is configuration, not development.
Local regulatory fit without a local development project.
- 09
Compliance control support
Ongoing support for your control framework: scenario and typology tuning, model-governance artefacts and examination support.
The control framework is maintained, not just installed.
02 Efficiency levers
Where the efficiency actually comes from
Five effects that compound across the operation. They are targets to validate in a pilot, given as ranges because that is how they behave in practice.
| Efficiency lever | How it works | Indicative impact |
|---|---|---|
| Single platform, zero switchover | One view of transactions, CRM, KYC and enrichments. No re-keying, no switching between five to eight systems. | 15–20% analyst time |
| Automated workflows and case linking | Dynamic workflows, case linking, email integration and auto-closure remove the manual handoffs and the copy-paste. | 10–15% per case |
| AI narratives on centralised data | The AI drafts the SAR/ŞİB narrative from the full dataset. The analyst reviews and approves. | 50–75% on that task |
| Back-dated runs eliminate projects | A new typology applied across full history in minutes, instead of a three-to-six-month consultant remediation. | US$100K–500K+ per event |
| Centralised proof and audit readiness | All evidence, history and decisions in one place with full audit trails. No folder shuffling at exam time. | 10–15% capacity freed |
Drafting a SAR/ŞİB narrative falls from two to four hours to minutes. Remediation to a new typology falls from months to overnight. The two numbers to watch in a pilot are average handling time per case, and analyst hours returned to higher-value work.
A full-platform deployment targets a 30% efficiency gain.
Business value and return on investment
03 Institutions
Who runs it
EyesClear is proven with mid-tier and regional banks. The same nine services are configured for the institution rather than rebuilt for it — a compliance function is the same shape wherever it sits.
- Retail and commercial banks
- Broker-dealers and investment firms
- Payment service providers
- Asset managers and fund administrators
- Virtual asset service providers
Which of the nine would you start with?
Most start where the backlog is: alert resolution, narrative drafting, or a back-book review they have been deferring.